Beyond Silicon Valley:
Growing Entrepreneurship
in Transitioning Economies
3 CONSISTENT COMPONENTS
1.
Perspective of an entrepreneur.
2.
Perspective of
thought leaders.
3.
Provide
international context.
Rockefeller, was the world's most famous entrepreneur
in the 19th century. He started his business in Cleveland.
In the decade 1910-1920, Cleveland turn from the sixth
largest to the fifth largest city in US, impelled by its population, its creativity
and industry. That is called the Rockefeller effect. As the 20th century wore
on, Cleveland's Rockefeller magic disappeared. In 2001, Entrepreneur Magazine
ranked Cleveland 61 out of 61 places. In 2012, it was the 47th largest city in
the country. The quiet crisis of 2000 is one aspect of what happened, but by
the 1950's Cleveland was a lock on heavy industry.
Brad Whitehead, a key player on the McKinsey team
tasked with making recommendations to Cleveland's community leaders on how to
move the local economy forward: "It was the chicken and egg debate, is the
problem that we don't have capital or is the problem that we don't have
investable ideas? And, I think we thought, that is probably an interesting
intellectual discussion. But probably the answer is, yes, we lack capital and
we lack investable ideas, so let's get working on both at the same time".
Bruce Katz, Vice President and Director of the Metropolitan
Policy Program, of the Brookings Institution in Washington, and the author of "The
Metropolitan Revolution" (published on 2013), looks at how cities across
the US try to grow their economy. He began a process of intervening in very
smart and deliberate ways in what really makes metropolitan economies work in
Cleveland: Innovation, entrepreneurship, manufacturing, and trade. He says that it is the one of the most successful
network models around de US.
Role of government in supporting entrepreneurs
What kind of initiatives should government support?
How it justifies its investments?
Why should governments support entrepreneurs?
Why should governments get involved in supporting
entrepreneurship at all?
The State of Ohio selected companies for investment
that would be successful in the market doing two key things:
- First, it required companies to find other investors to match the government grants. Outside match requirement.
- Second, the government would require third party independent evaluators to make recommendations for allocation. Third party independent evaluation.
The Third Frontier program, created 11 years ago, due
to the need for a significant program to support innovation in the Ohio
economy, felt by the then Ohio's governor, Bob Taft, "came out of the desperation
and the need to make change", said Lisa Delp, Former Executive Director of
this program.
Rebecca Bagley, President and CEO at Nortech in
Cleveland, thinks that Third Frontier program was critical because it is an
extremely unique program across the country. She explains: "For one thing,
it's at scale. So it's a very large program when in comparison to other states.
There's only a handful of other states who have programs that large. It's also
been sustained program. So we've been able to sustain that level of funding for
almost the last ten years".
The measure of success of the Third Frontier program to
support entrepreneurship, is considered by three key metrics: Job creation,
tax revenue, and the amount of
follow-on capital that has raised
bye entrepreneurs after the state investment.
Morrys Wheeler, Founder at Drummond Road Capital,
points out that "government can be an important, and in some cases
necessary, catalyst for start-up activity. But it shouldn't attempt to be the
kingmaker. And it shouldn't attempt to design the start-up activity. Instead,
it should look at the entrepreneurs, it should look at the needs, and work as a
catalyzer and as an enabler, not as a controller of entrepreneurial activity."
Some organizations involved in supporting entrepreneurship
around the world, such as Endeavor, are less enthusiastic about working closely
with governmental entities. Peter Kellner, co-founder of Endeavor Global, assure
that his organization avoid working with government because "there are
always strings attached, and you never know what's going to happen in
government; people leave, people come in, the incentives are not aligned with
your strategy, which is long term".
Government involvement in providing support for
entrepreneurship is complicated. The ultimate return on investment can take
years, if not decades, and political leaders tend to want results more quickly.
So here are some key factors to consider:
·
How big is the
program? Funding has to be large enough to make an impact.
·
How will the
program be set up to avoid favoritism?
·
How diverse will
the program be?
·
Would it fund different
stages of entrepreneurship from imagining to sales?
·
Would it fund
both research and entrepreneurship?
·
What metrics
will be used to measure success?
The role of philanthropy and donors in supporting
entrepreneurs
1.
Why donors get
involved in supporting entrepreneurs?
2.
How donors have
different expectations from government and private investors? (in terms of
expectations of the organizations they support).
3.
Battling donor
fatigue. The challenges of maintaining donor interest in entrepreneurship over
the long haul.
US laws allows individuals or corporations to donate
money without paying taxes on the money. Often time, these donations are
channeled through foundations.
The Cleveland foundation was the first community
foundation in the United States. It supported the Cleveland Orchestra and the
Cleveland Museum of Art. They had not traditionally focused on economic development.
However this changed in the 1980s when Cleveland's economy was suffering with
the decline of its manufacturing base.
In 2002, the government of Ohio started to support
entrepreneurship with the creation of the Third Frontier Program. At the same
time, several leading foundations in northeast Ohio started to pool resources
for economic development and entrepreneurship. The initiative was called the Fund
for Our Economic Future, and it was a philanthropic collaboration program that
was truly unique in the United States.
David Levine, the founder of Wireless Environment, is
one such entrepreneur whose company benefited from philanthropic funding. In
2008, Jump Start, a local organization funded by donors, granted $400,000
investment to Wireless Environment.
Dorothy Baunach, the former CEO of Nortech, believes
that it is a challenge to convince foundations to invest in entrepreneurs like
David Levine. She thinks that the orchestra and the museum are wonderful,
nevertheless, if there are not jobs for people, and investment in companies,
they were not going to survive. She said that in the 1980s there were about 25 Fortune
500 companies, and now it descended to 10 or 12, so if they did not do anything,
they were going to leave, too.
The Cleveland Foundation helped start the unique Fund
for Our Economic Future. Brad Whitehead leads it, and explains that it is a philanthropic's
communities response to the long term economic challenges, facing northeast
Ohio. They have some 50 plus members, who pooled their financial resources to
work with the economic vibrancy of their region through grant-making, convening,
and sponsoring research.
Deborah Hoover serves at the CEO of the Foundation and
as chair of the Fund for Our Economic Future. She explains that it has been a
really aggressive match requirement on the part of the state of Ohio for their
local economic development organizations to access those dollars, but it was
finally a really good thing, because the money coming from the state invested
in high-tech startups is significant.
Professor Michael Goldberg affirms that donors are more
patient than the private sector and government in seeing their investments in
entrepreneurship bear fruit.
Baiju Shah, former BioEntreprise CEO asserts that "government
can never be the place where you look to for sustained investment in a strategy
because of the short timeframes in which they operate, due to election cycles".
Keeping donors engaged and avoiding fatigue is a
challenge, says Whitehead, "because it is tiring to stay with something
for so long", and it takes decades.
Peter Kellner, cofounder of Endeavor, an international
organization that supports high-growth entrepreneurship, argues that philanthropists
around the world are not patients with entrepreneurship programs.
Philanthropy or donations come from sources other than
foundations internationally. These philanthropic sources typically include:
·
foreign
government through their development assistance programs,
·
non-governmental
organizations, and
·
corporate
donations.
As a recapitulation:
·
Government policy
can play key role in catalyzing donor support.
·
Donors often work
independently from governments.
·
One important
point we learned about donors as investors is they are generally more patient
than private-sector or government backers of startup companies. But even they
can get tired and it is a challenge to keep them interested and engaged when
the results of their funding are often best measured over decades.
Intermediary Organizations
In Cleveland, governments and donors committed
significant resources to back entrepreneurs, but leaders quickly realized that
an organization was needed to appropriately and wisely deploy this investment
into private companies.
In 2004, JumpStart was created as a venture development non-profit
organization to support innovative startup companies by providing:
·
pre-seed
funding,
·
developing
networks of angel investors, and
·
making
connections for follow-on funding for venture capital firms.
It also provides technical assistance and support to help
entrepreneurs develop their business plans, connect to mentors and attract the
necessary talent to manage and grow their companies.
JumpStart has received more than $75 million in funds
to deliver in programs.
·
Why Cleveland created JumpStart?
·
How to measure success?
·
What are the challenges?
The first entrepreneur to receive an investment from
JumpStart was Laura Bennet, the founder of Embrace Pet Insurance. They sell health
insurance for cats and dogs in the US.
In ten years, JumpStart has invested nearly $30
million directly into its 76 startups companies through it investment fund.
JumpStart provides funding at the seed capital stage when it is extremely
critical for capital to be locally available. JumpStart fund is structured as
what is known as an evergreen, which means any investment gains that it makes
on its portfolio companies, gets put back into the fund to be invested in new
companies. So, JumpStart see some initial returns on its investment when a
company is sold or has an initial public offering.
Key metrics for success applied by JumpStart for the
exit/return on investment are:
·
To raise
follow-on capital
·
To generate
revenue
·
To create jobs
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
Déjanos tu e-mail y teléfono para contactarte de vuelta si te interesa este servicio.